| August 2001 Jazz
It didnt take long into that first listen to get my sluggish, rock-oriented mind to realize that Kind of Blue was music I hadnt anticipated as well as music that was going to profoundly change my musical universe. What I heard therein was at once inspired and yet intellectual. It forced me to use my mind as well as my ears in its enjoyment, as rock had increasingly stopped doing as the '70s turned into the '80s. The freedom, improvisation and, most importantly, the feelings put into the music reminded me of the rock I grew up on. I was amazed that music written both before and around the time of my birth could sound so vital and alive some 30 years later (remember, Im talking mid '80s here). I was hooked. I also found that there was a reason many people called jazz Americas classical music. To understand just what it is that I mean by that statement, were going to have to examine just what the term classical music means. Classical music was not written and performed just for the wealthy or well-to-do (as it may seem to be today); it was written with the people of the day fixed firmly in mind. Most composers, say until 1800, had to be under the financial protection of wealthy patrons for their survival. But even though they wrote music for those patrons (who were, after all, paying the freight), they knew that to keep their music alive, it would have to be played for, as well as appeal to, the common man. A good example of such a composer was Handel. His Music For The Royal Fireworks was intended to please both the king, who helped support him, as well as the general population that brought him the fame he so craved. (And if you take issue with this statement, ask yourself why Handel never returned home to Germany after experiencing success in England.) Another example is Mozarts opera The Magic Flute, today a staple of any opera company. It was written almost exclusively for the commoners of Vienna. Classical music expressed the feelings of the times, the desires of the composers, just as jazz did in this country.
One of the tools I bought early on to help me on my search was the Smithsonian Guide to Classic Jazz, a six-album boxed set that also comes, for those of you turntableless, in a CD version. It included work by many of the aforementioned artists, as well as many, many others. The boxed set includes not only the records (or CDs) but also a very informative booklet that gives insights into the music as well as the artists. This set is just a superb help to the jazz neophyte, as well as a reference for the seasoned veteran. I highly recommend it, especially to those of you who dont know (or dont think) youll like jazz. Its given me quite a number of optional directions to explore, as well as opening my eyes and ears even further as to the merits of my new musical discoveries. There is also a Smithsonian boxed set of big-band music, which I also have and recommend. About the only unfortunate thing Ive discovered about getting into jazz these days, if you are a vinyl lover that is (CD fans can skip this part, but only to an extent), is the cost and availability of original jazz albums. By and large, the original pressing of a jazz record (or any other type of music for that matter) is the best, and sometimes the only way of hearing the music at its sonic peak. And original albums from the early days are EXPENSIVE. Even with the Internet, original albums in very good to excellent condition, especially Blue Notes, can put a serious dent in your wallet -- that is, if you can afford them at all. Availability is another problem. Finding what you want on vinyl in a condition good enough to allow you to hear whats on the record can be very, very hard (and this is where you CD devotees should start paying attention; not all the albums YOU might want to hear are even on CD, and if they are, they are likely early '80s versions with sonic problems). Also, jazz recorded at the beginning of the stereo era (circa 1957-65) is best heard in mono, as that format generally gives superior sound. Early jazz stereo was very much a left-channel/right-channel (occasionally center too) proposition. So what conclusions can be drawn from this missive? That sometimes serendipity can strike by simply opening your ears to a new musical style. And while I would recommend jazz, trying any style not now familiar to you may very well be worth your time and money. Sometimes, you just never know. ...John Crossett GO BACK TO: |